Evolution of Compliance with the Level of Electronic Transparency of Peruvian Ministries, 2018-2020

Main Article Content

Abstract

Until 2017, only one out of eighteen ministries in Peru published complete information on the Standard Transparency Portal, as stipulated by the Transparency Law. This article provides a diagnosis of the evolution of that result for the period 2018-2020 and records a slight increase. Two tools provided data: applying a table of indicators of form and content to the information published by ministries on their portals and assessing these results with a statistical programme. Three ministries published complete information and reached the maximum score, while fifteen failed to comply with the law. Nevertheless, there is progress concerning compliance with the law due to the volume and characteristics of published data.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite

Navarro-Castillo, Y., & Rodríguez Mendoza, M. (2024). Evolution of Compliance with the Level of Electronic Transparency of Peruvian Ministries, 2018-2020 . Estado & Comunes, 2(19), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.37228/estado_comunes.v2.n19.2024.375

Issue

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Yulissa Navarro-Castillo, Miguel Rodríguez Mendoza

References

1
Ababneh, R., & Alrefaie, L. (2022). Evaluating the quality of public administration institutes’ websites in the Arab world. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, ahead-of-print, 73(4-5), 554-574. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-12-2021-0208
2
Abramov, V., & Andreev, V. (2023). Analysis of strategies for digital transformation of russian regions in the context of achieving national goals. National Research University, Higher School of Econoimics, 1, 89-119. https://vgmu.hse.ru/en/2023--1/820911635.html
3
Adu, K., & Ngulube, P. (2016). Preserving the digital heritage of public institutions in Ghana in the wake of electronic government. Library Hi Tech, 34(4), 748-763. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-07-2016-0077
4
Ahmi, A., & Mohamad, R. (2016). Evaluating Accessibility of Malaysian Ministries Websites Using WCAG 2.0 and Section 508 Guideline. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering, 8(8). https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3170469
5
Akgül, Y. (2019). The Accessibility, Usability, Quality and Readability of Turkish State and Local Government Websites an Exploratory Study. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 15(1), 62-81. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2019010105
6
Al-Okaily, M., et al. (2023). Determinants of user satisfaction with financial information systems in the digital transformation era: Insights from emerging markets. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, (Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-12-2022-0285
7
Al-Rzoky, H., et al. (2019). E-governance applications and usage patterns in developing countries. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 7(3), 1308-1317. https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v7i3.719
8
Amoako, R., et al. (2023). Factors influencing electronic human resource management implementation in public organisations in an emerging economy: An empirical study. South African Journal of Business Management, 54(1), https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v54i1.2937
9
Calzati, S., & van Loenen, B. (2023). Beyond federated data: A data commoning proposition for the EU’s citizen-centric digital strategy. AI & SOCIETY. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01743-9
10
Chidama, Y., & Ononiwu, C. G. (2023). Mechanisms fostering the sustainability of actualized value propositions of implemented e-Government projects in Sub-Saharan Africa: A realist evaluation case of Nigeria and Rwanda. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 89(4), e12256. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12256
11
Choudhuri, B., et al. (2023). Enterprise architecture as a responsible data driven urban digitization framework: Enabling circular cities in India. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05187-8
12
Danyliuk, M., et al. (2021). Digitisation of Ukraine in Terms of Public Electronic Services’ Distribution. Scientific Horizons, 7(24). https://doi.org/10.48077/scihor.24(7).2021.90-99
13
De Classe, T., et al. (2021). Public Processes Are Open for Play. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 2(4), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3474879
14
Defensoría del Pueblo (2022). Soporte teórico del derecho humano al acceso a la información pública. Defensoría del Pueblo. https://repositorio.dpe.gob.ec/handle/39000/3365
15
Halásková, M., et al. (2023). Indicators of government effectiveness in European countries: Empirical analysis with the use of panel data. Transformations in Business and Economics, 22(1), 280-298. https://publikace.k.utb.cz/handle/10563/1011533
16
Hassan, R. (2023). Approach using interpretive structural model and MICMAC analysis for identifying barriers influencing e-administration implementation in Egypt. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 25(6), 616-633. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-01-2023-0012
17
Infobae (16 de mayo de 2024). Récord de inestabilidad: Perú suma 13 ministros del Interior en menos de tres años. https://n9.cl/ogqva
18
Instituto de Estudios Peruanos (2016). Baja confianza en las instituciones peruanas afecta el ejercicio de su autoridad. https://n9.cl/u2y4n
19
Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática [INEI] (2020). Perú: percepción ciudadana sobre gobernabilidad, democracia y confianza en las instituciones. Informe técnico del INEI. https://n9.cl/ujx03
20
Jansen, B., et al. (2023). Pushing boundaries: An empirical view on the digital sovereignty of six governments in the midst of geopolitical tensions. Government Information Quarterly: An International Journal of Information Technology Management, Policies, and Practices, 40(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101862
21
Kniazieva, T., et al. (2023). Analysis of the Impact of Digitalization on the Quality and Availability of Public Services in Ukraine – A Comparative Approach with Insights from Estonia. Statistics, Politics and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1515/spp-2023-0012
22
Kontogeorgis, G., & Varotsis, N. (2021). Reinstating greek e-governance: a framework for e-government benchmarking, improvement and government policies. Public Administration Issues, 0(6), 103-127. https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2021-0-6-103-127
23
Kunkel, S., & Matthess, M. (2020). Digital transformation and environmental sustainability in industry: Putting expectations in Asian and African policies into perspective. Environmental Science & Policy, 112, 318-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.022
24
Lee, J., et al. (2019). The effect of entrepreneurship on start-up open innovation: Innovative behavior of university students. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5040103
25
Litovtseva, V., et al. (2022). Marketing research in the context of trust in the public sector: A case of the digital environment. Innovative Marketing, 18(4), 133-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.18(4).2022.12
26
Lourenço, R., et al. (2011). Transparência financeira do Sector Empresarial Local: informação disponibilizada nos sítios web. Relatório de investigação - INESC Coimbra, 9, 1-21. https://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/handle/1822/23346
27
Mahmoud, M., & Othman, R. (2023). Effects of New Public Management Reforms on Human Resource Practices: A Case Study in Jordan. Management and Labour Studies, 49(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042X231185216
28
Maroco, J. (2003). Análise Estatística com utilização do SPSS. Edições Sílabo.
29
Martínez, R. (2023). La corrupción en el Perú: situación, respuestas y resultados. Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial, 15(19), 163-183. https://doi.org/10.35292/ropj.v15i19.719
30
Ministerio de Justicia y Derechos Humanos (2021). Reporte de Seguimiento del PESEM 2019-2024 Año 2020. https://n9.cl/jbxk67
31
Morgan, A. (2023). Desarrollo del talento humano en las organizaciones públicas del Perú. Pensamiento Actual, 23(40). https://doi.org/10.15517/pa.v23i40.55173
32
Navarro, Y. (2019). Nivel de transparencia electrónica de los ministerios peruanos. Revista Tierra Nuestra, 13(2), 104-117. https://doi.org/10.21704/rtn.v13i2.1881
33
Organización para la Cooperación y Desarrollo Económico [OCDE] (2016). Estrategia de competencias de la OCDE Reporte Diagnóstico: Perú 2016. https://n9.cl/riuiv
34
Paredes, M., & Encinas, D. (2020). Perú 2019: crisis política y salida institucional. Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago), 40(2), 483-510. https://n9.cl/bzu8y
35
Presidencia del Consejo de Ministros (2022). Perú logra ubicarse entre los primeros países del mundo con mayor avance en transformación digital este 2022. https://n9.cl/5n8yu
36
Rodríguez-Román, R. (2021). Gobierno digital en los gobiernos locales en América Latina. Revista Arbitrada Interdisciplinaria KOINONIA, 6(11). https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=576868768012
37
Sala, J. (2021). Los desafíos de la transformación digital de la democracia. RECERCA. Revista de Pensament i Anàlisi, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.6035/recerca.4660
38
Skierka, I. (2023). When shutdown is no option: Identifying the notion of the digital government continuity paradox in Estonia’s eID crisis. Government Information Quarterly, 40(1), 101781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101781
39
Transparency International (2019). Global corruption barometer Latin America & the Caribbean 2019. Citizens’ views and experiences of corruption. https://n9.cl/ourhe
40
van Kersbergen, K., & Vis, B. (2022). Digitalization as a policy response to social acceleration: Comparing democratic problem solving in Denmark and the Netherlands. Government Information Quarterly, 39(3), 101707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101707
41
Wahyu, A., et al. (2019). A case study of indonesian government digital transformation: 5th International Conference on Science and Technology, ICST 2019. Proceedings - 2019 5th International Conference on Science and Technology, ICST 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICST47872.2019.9166234
42
Yaokumah, W., & Biney, E. (2020). Integrated Financial Management Information System Project Implementation in Ghana Government Ministries. International Journal of Information Technology Project Management (IJITPM), 11(1), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJITPM.2020010102
43
Documentos normativos y legislación
44
Constitución Política del Perú (1993). Diario El Peruano. Publicado el 23 de diciembre de 1993.
45
Decreto Supremo N.º 004-2013-PCM (2013). Modernización de la Gestión Pública. Diario el Peruano. Publicado el 8 de enero del 2013.
46
Decreto Supremo N.º 063-2010-PCM (2010). Decreto Supremo que aprueba la implementación del Portal de Transparencia Estándar en las Entidades de la Administración Pública. Diario El Peruano. Publicado el 2 de junio del 2010.
47
Decreto Supremo N.º 072-2003-PCM (2003) Reglamento de la Ley de Transparencia y Acceso a la Información Pública. Diario El Peruano. Publicado el 13 de agosto de 2003.
48
Directiva N.º 001-2010-PCM/SGA (2003). Lineamientos para la implementación del Portal de Transparencia Estándar en las Entidades de la Administración Pública. Diario El Peruano. Publicado el 8 de agosto de 2003.
49
Ley N.º 30934 (2019). Ley que modifica la Ley N.º 27806, Ley de Transparencia y Acceso a la Información, respecto a la transparencia en el Poder Judicial, el Ministerio Público, la Junta Nacional de Justicia, el Tribunal Constitucional y la Academia de la Magistratura. Diario El Peruano. Publicado el 23 de abril de 2019.
50
Ley N.º 27806 (2002). Ley de Transparencia y Acceso a la Información Pública. Diario El Peruano. Publicado el 8 de agosto de 2002.
51
Ministerio de Educación (s/f). ¿Sabes qué es un portal de transparencia estándar? http://www.minedu.gob.pe/pdf/portal_transparencia_estandar.pdf
52
Transparencia Económica (2024). Consulta Amigable. Consulta de Ejecución del Gasto. https://apps5.mineco.gob.pe/transparencia/Navegador/default.aspx